Trilateral Talks Face Uncertainty as Putin Questions Zelensky’s Legitimacy

Washington- U.S. President Donald Trump has announced plans to hold a trilateral meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 22, raising hopes of a potential breakthrough in the grinding Ukraine conflict. The proposal, welcomed by Zelensky and supported by key European leaders including U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has injected new momentum into international diplomacy. Yet, questions over Zelensky’s legitimacy and Putin’s hardline stance threaten to derail the initiative before it begins.

During a meeting at the White House with Zelensky, Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and EU leaders Ursula von der Leyen and Mark Rutte, Trump pledged “very strong security and protection” for Ukraine. The Western leaders reaffirmed their unified stance that peace must be built on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Zelensky himself called the trilateral meeting “a good idea,” expressing hope that Trump could serve as a mediator capable of pushing Putin toward compromise.

However, Putin has repeatedly dismissed Zelensky’s authority, arguing that his presidential term expired earlier this year and that he no longer represents Ukraine legally. Moscow has instead signaled willingness to negotiate only with alternative Ukrainian figures or through direct talks with Washington and European powers. This position casts serious doubt on whether the proposed trilateral meeting can even take place, let alone yield substantive results.

Diplomatic analysts say Trump’s eagerness to host a trilateral summit reflects both his desire to showcase leadership on the global stage and his belief that personal dealmaking could succeed where traditional diplomacy has stalled. The Alaska summit last week between Trump and Putin was described as “warm and constructive,” but it ended without agreements on ceasefire or territorial issues. Trump has since hinted that peace might not require a formal ceasefire, a remark that has unsettled European allies and underscored the divisions in Western strategy.

For Zelensky, participation in a U.S.-brokered trilateral meeting is both an opportunity and a risk. While it could elevate his standing and reaffirm his recognition among allies, it also exposes him to further attacks from Moscow, which continues to label him illegitimate. European leaders meanwhile fear that if Putin refuses to attend, the event could weaken rather than strengthen the Ukrainian position.

Looking ahead, the stakes remain high. If Trump succeeds in bringing Putin and Zelensky to the same table on August 22, it would mark the first direct three-way negotiation since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. A failure, however, could deepen the diplomatic stalemate, leaving Ukraine more vulnerable and Europe divided on how to proceed. Much will depend on whether Trump can leverage his rapport with Putin from Alaska to soften Moscow’s resistance and convince him that engagement, even with Zelensky, is preferable to continued isolation.

As of now, the world watches with cautious anticipation. The coming days will determine whether the proposed trilateral meeting becomes a historic step toward peace or another missed chance in a war that has already redrawn the global order.

Zelensky Rejects Trump’s Peace Deal: Demands Ceasefire Before Talks

Brussels-Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has dismissed US President Donald Trump’s call for a peace deal with Russia, saying a ceasefire must come first before discussing any settlement.

Speaking alongside European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday, Zelensky said Moscow has made “many demands” and stressed that Kyiv cannot negotiate “under pressure of weapons.” He also ruled out any territorial concessions, noting that Ukraine’s constitution forbids trading land.

Trump earlier voiced frustration with Zelensky for using constitutional limits as a reason to avoid compromises, remarking that while Kyiv had authority to wage war, it still claimed to need approval for a land swap.

Von der Leyen, who will join Zelensky in Washington for talks with Trump, repeated her call for Ukraine to become a “steel porcupine” resistant to invasion. She pledged continued EU support to boost Ukraine’s defense industry, particularly in drone production.

Russia, however, has rejected Ukraine’s ceasefire demand, arguing Kyiv would use the pause to regroup and rearm.

Trump Urges Zelensky to Accept Concessions for Quick Peace with Russia

Washington- US President Donald Trump has said Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky could end the conflict with Russia “immediately” by agreeing to a settlement that rules out NATO membership and includes territorial concessions.

Zelensky has been called to the White House on Monday to discuss the proposal, which reports suggest could involve Kyiv giving up its remaining positions in Donbass and freezing battle lines in exchange for a halt in fighting. Zelensky has already rejected such terms, insisting that Crimea and other occupied regions remain part of Ukraine.

In a Truth Social post, Trump reminded followers that Crimea was taken during the Obama administration “without a shot being fired,” and stressed there would be “no going into NATO by Ukraine.” He argued that compromises may be necessary for peace.

The meeting follows Trump’s talks in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where both leaders expressed cautious optimism about future negotiations. Moscow continues to insist that any settlement must see Ukraine drop its NATO ambitions, accept demilitarization and recognize Russian control over Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye.

Russian President Putin said any lasting deal must address Moscow’s security concerns and restore balance in Europe. Meanwhile, US special envoy Steve Witkoff told that Washington and its allies are weighing possible security guarantees for Ukraine outside NATO.