Trump issues 10% tariff threat to BRICS

President Donald Trump has claimed that BRICS is “fading out fast,” while warning that any attempts by the group to challenge the US dollar will be met with a harsh economic backlash.

Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump denounced what he called BRICS’ attempts to weaken the dollar. “They wanted to try and take over the dollar, the dominance of the dollar… And I said, anybody that’s in the BRICS consortium of nations, we’re going to tariff you 10%.”

Trump stressed that Washington will spare no effort to preserve the dollar’s hegemony. “The reserve currency is so important. You know, if we lost that, that would be like losing a World War.”

Washington “can never let anyone play games,” Trump said, adding that he has decided to “hit them [BRICS] very, very hard.” “If they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly,” he said.

Trump also claimed his threat to impose 10% tariffs on imports from the BRICS had completely derailed the group’s summit in Rio de Janeiro earlier this month. “They had a meeting the following day and almost nobody showed up,” he said.

However, the BRICS summit featured broad participation at the highest level. While China’s President Xi Jinping was absent from the meeting, his country was represented by Chinese Premier Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin was also absent, but addressed the summit remotely.

Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa and Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto, as well as leaders from Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE attended in person.

In October, Russia’s Finance Minister Anton Siluanov stated that the share of national currencies in trade among BRICS countries has reached 65%, with the share of the dollar and euro plunging below 30%.

Earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explained that BRICS countries are exploring dollar alternatives “to shield themselves from US arbitrariness.” 

However, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said that BRICS has never been meant as a rival to the US, although warning that “the language of threats and manipulation… is not the way to speak to members of this group.”

BRICS Summit in Brazil Signals Shift Toward Multipolar World

The recently concluded BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro has underlined a growing desire among emerging economies to reshape the global order and counter Western dominance. Leaders of the five founding BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—along with new members Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, gathered with a unified message: the world needs a fairer, more multipolar system that reflects the realities of today’s economic and geopolitical landscape.

Brazilian President Lula da Silva set the tone by comparing BRICS to the Non-Aligned Movement, stating that the bloc has become a key defender of multilateralism at a time when it is “under attack.” Throughout the summit, BRICS leaders stressed the urgent need for reform of global institutions like the UN Security Council, the IMF, and the World Bank, arguing that their governance structures are outdated and fail to represent the interests of the Global South. The push for change is driven by a sense of frustration over longstanding Western dominance in international decision-making.

Finance ministers reached consensus on reforming IMF quotas to give emerging markets greater influence, and the summit produced strong backing for the New Development Bank’s new Multilateral Guarantee (BMG) fund. This fund aims to attract private investment into infrastructure, green energy, and climate resilience projects across BRICS member countries. Delegates emphasized that for every $1 guaranteed through the BMG, up to $10 in private capital could be unlocked, demonstrating a more market-driven approach to development financing.

A key focus was the bloc’s ambition to reduce dependency on the US dollar by boosting intra-BRICS trade using local currencies. Russia and China have already intensified their bilateral currency settlements, and discussions about launching a digital BRICS currency, while still in the early stages, signal a clear long-term strategy to challenge the dollar’s hegemony in global transactions. The summit also considered ways to institutionalize these efforts through the NDB and a possible BRICS payments platform.

The Rio summit highlighted the remarkable growth of BRICS since its founding in 2009. Together, the member states now account for over half the world’s population and around 40% of global GDP, giving the bloc substantial leverage to influence international norms and economic policies. Leaders discussed expanding BRICS membership further, as more than 30 countries have expressed interest in joining. The recent addition of key Middle Eastern and Southeast Asian nations demonstrates the group’s ambition to build a broader coalition representing the Global South.

Yet, significant internal challenges remain. India and China’s border tensions, diverging foreign policies, and the mix of political systems—ranging from democracies like India and South Africa to authoritarian regimes in China and Russia—create friction that can weaken BRICS’ cohesion. The absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin from key sessions of the summit also raised questions about the bloc’s internal unity and commitment.

Despite these obstacles, BRICS leaders presented a united front in opposing Western protectionism, unilateral sanctions, and perceived attempts to maintain an outdated geopolitical order. The summit’s statements highlighted a shared determination to create alternative systems of trade, finance, and governance that better serve the interests of developing nations. By pursuing de-dollarization, strengthening the New Development Bank, and championing reforms in global institutions, BRICS is positioning itself as the collective voice of the Global South.

Nonetheless, analysts caution that BRICS risks diluting its identity as it expands. The diversity of interests among old and new members could make it harder to reach consensus on major issues, from climate action to geopolitical conflicts like the war in Ukraine or tensions in the Middle East. Additionally, BRICS’ ability to move from ambitious declarations to concrete outcomes will determine whether it emerges as a genuine force for change or remains a symbolic counterweight to the West.

The BRICS summit in Brazil stands as a powerful symbol of a shifting world order. But for the bloc to truly reshape global governance, it must overcome its internal differences, deliver on its promises of development financing and institutional reform, and address the social and economic needs of its vast populations. Only then can BRICS evolve from a coalition of convenience into a transformative platform capable of redefining the rules of the 21st-century global economy.