Parliament Passes Land Bill with Majority Support

Kathmandu — The House of Representatives on Friday passed the Land Bill 2082, which amends several existing laws related to land. Speaker Devraj Ghimire announced the bill’s approval after it was endorsed by a majority vote.

Minister for Land Management, Cooperatives and Poverty Alleviation, Balram Adhikari, had presented the proposal for decision. He explained that the bill was introduced to provide land to landless Dalits, squatters, and unmanaged settlers, aiming to regulate settlement patterns across the country. According to him, families living in risky areas will be relocated to integrated settlements through coordination with local governments.

However, some lawmakers criticized the bill. Rajkishor Yadav of the JASAPA argued that the intended groups may not benefit as expected, while lawmaker Prakash Adhikari claimed that the bill lacked constitutional analysis and could favor land mafias. Maoist chief whip Hitraj Pandey said some provisions were impractical and would not serve the general public’s interest. Similarly, Maoist whip Rupa Sosi Chaudhary, though supporting the provision of land to Dalits and squatters, accused the bill of including arrangements that would benefit real estate businesses.

Opposition parties draw Speaker Ghimire’s attention to ordinance

Kathmandu: Speaker Devraj Ghimire has held discussions with the chief whips of the ruling and opposition parties on the conduct of the winter session of the parliament , which will begin on Magh 18.

On Sunday, he held discussions with the whips of both the ruling and opposition parties on how to bring in more business during the winter session and what kind of agenda can be put on the business and advisory committee.

Maoist Center Chief Whip Hitraj Pandey said that more MPs and ministers from the ruling party are absent than the opposition and suggested that more attention should be paid to the role of the ruling party to make the meeting effective.

Chief Whip Pandey said that it was wrong to bring an ordinance without withdrawing the bill that was in the parliamentary committee and drew the attention of the Speaker to the ordinance being brought by circumventing the parliament.

Chief whips of the opposition parties have suggested that the Parliament Secretariat should have also alerted the government about the ordinance and move forward by setting an agenda for the meeting of the Business and Consultative Committee.