UML Central Committee meeting passes eight-point resolution including statute amendment

Kathmandu — The ninth meeting of the Nepal Communist Party (UML) Central Committee, held for two days at the party’s central office, Chyasal, under the chairmanship of party chairman and Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, has passed an eight-point resolution on contemporary political activities in the country, government effectiveness, and the statutory general convention, among other contemporary issues.

It has been decided that the proposal regarding the statute amendment, incorporating the suggestions received from the members of the Central Committee, will be sent to the party’s provincial and district committees for further suggestions.

In the meeting, Vice-Chairman Bishnu Prasad Poudel presented the proposal regarding the statute amendment, while General Secretary Shankar Pokharel informed about the organizational work.

Similarly, the meeting has decided to express high respect to former President Bidya Devi Bhandari. 264 members expressed their views in the meeting.

UML’s disagreement with the Citizenship Bill

The main opposition CPN-UML expressed its disagreement with the certification of the Citizenship Bill.

CPN-UML General Secretary Shankar Pokharel has given an explanation after a confusion been created on the UML’s objection about the citizenship bill and about the ordinance that UML was trying to put forward .

While giving an explanation, he said that his party believes that at least the same system should be maintained between India and Nepal in terms of Matrimonial adoption. He said that the current provision in India is that citizenship is acquired within 7 years of marriage and in Nepal, citizenship is acquired immediately after marriage.

Similarly, he said that the constitution provides for the citizenship system to reveal the territorial identity, but it is not included in the current bill. Similarly, he has said that his party disagrees with the bill because it has ignored the parliamentary process.

He also said that it is not a natural process to prove the flawed and incomplete bill without entering into the parliament and without entering into the serious questions raised constitutionally by the former president.
He also said that the old inactive bill passed through the backdoor on the event of PM’s visit to India is not a naturally driven process.