Hamas signals willingness to release Israeli hostages

GAZA- The Palestinian group Hamas has announced that it is ready to release all Israeli hostages and begin talks, through mediators, to finalize the details of the exchange. The group also expressed willingness to transfer control of Gaza to an independent Palestinian body.

Hamas said on Friday that the decision followed a “thorough study” of the 20-point peace plan presented by US President Donald Trump earlier this week. The plan includes an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, a hostages-for-prisoners swap, a phased withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and the establishment of a temporary international administration.

In a statement, Hamas confirmed its agreement to release both living and deceased Israeli captives “according to the exchange formula” set out in Trump’s proposal. It added that it is prepared to enter immediate negotiations, through mediators, to work out the implementation.

The group also stated it is ready to hand over Gaza’s administration to “a Palestinian body of independents,” describing it as a technocratic authority formed through Palestinian national consensus and supported by Arab and Islamic states.

Hamas, however, did not clearly accept or reject other elements of the plan, such as its complete disarmament. It said those “other issues” should be addressed within a broader Palestinian national framework, in which Hamas would also take part.

Clashes erupt across Italy during Nationwide Pro-Palestinian protests

Rome- Thousands of Italians joined nationwide protests on Monday in solidarity with Palestinians, leading to violent clashes in several cities. The demonstrations, organized by trade unions, spread to nearly 80 towns and cities, with the largest turnouts in Milan and Rome.

In Milan, tensions escalated near the central station where protesters clashed with police, leaving about 60 officers injured. A group of masked protesters threw stones, smoke bombs, and metal objects, prompting police to respond with water cannons and tear gas. Similar unrest was reported in Bologna, where demonstrators blocked the city’s main ring road.

The strike brought together teachers, dockworkers, and students, disrupting public transport and operations at major ports in Livorno and Genoa. A metro line in Milan was shut down, and university students in Turin and Bologna blocked lecture halls. Protesters carried banners with slogans such as “Free Palestine” and “Let’s block everything.”

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned the violence in Milan as “shameful,” saying it undermined the cause of Gaza and only harmed Italian citizens. Milan’s mayor, Giuseppe Sala, also criticized the vandalism as unjustifiable.

The unrest came as debates over Palestinian statehood deepened in Europe. France formally recognized a Palestinian state on Monday, following similar moves by the UK, Canada, portugal and Australia. President Emmanuel Macron called the decision a “necessity,” supported by Belgium, Malta, and Luxembourg. Other European nations, including Spain and Norway, had already taken the step last year.

Italy’s government, however, has resisted recognition, calling it “counter-productive.” Opposition leader Elly Schlein accused Meloni of avoiding serious debate on Israel, criticizing her for giving lighthearted interviews instead of addressing parliament.

European leaders have toughened their tone toward Israel’s offensive in Gaza. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently urged an end to the “horrific events” in the enclave. While Germany remains a close ally of Israel, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has grown more critical of its actions, though Berlin insists Palestinian statehood recognition should come only at the end of a peace process.

The man behind decades of war: Benjamin Netanyahu’s long history of conflict

Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, has spent more than three decades positioning himself as the architect of Israel’s aggressive regional posture, leaving behind a legacy defined by repeated wars, interventions, and accusations of grave human rights abuses. Since his rise in the 1990s, Netanyahu has consistently framed Israel’s security in zero-sum terms, using overwhelming force against enemies real or perceived across Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and beyond, while leveraging perpetual conflict as a tool to maintain his grip on power despite repeated corruption scandals.

Netanyahu’s tenure has been marked by devastating wars on Gaza. In the wake of the Hamas-led attack on October 7, which killed around 1,200 Israelis and saw more than 240 hostages taken, Netanyahu launched a relentless campaign of bombings and siege tactics on Gaza. This operation cut off water, food, and fuel for over two million people, prompting accusations of collective punishment from humanitarian groups. By June 2025, Palestinian health authorities reported over 56,000 killed, including tens of thousands of children, and more than 130,000 injured. UN agencies, Médecins Sans Frontières, and the International Criminal Court described Israel’s use of starvation and systematic attacks on civilian infrastructure as war crimes, with the ICC issuing arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his defense minister in May 2024 for crimes against humanity, including murder and persecution.

But Gaza is only the latest chapter in Netanyahu’s pattern of warfare. Early in his first term (1996–1999), Netanyahu endorsed Operation Grapes of Wrath in Lebanon, where Israeli shelling killed over 100 civilians sheltering at a UN base in Qana. Throughout the 2000s and 2010s, he repeatedly vowed to destroy Hezbollah, telling Israeli voters and the international community that Israel would “return Lebanon to the stone age” if rockets were fired into Israel. After Hezbollah’s rise as a formidable force following the 2006 Lebanon war, Netanyahu’s threats and occasional airstrikes on Lebanon became a permanent feature of his military policy. His statements warning of “obliterating” Lebanon’s infrastructure if Hezbollah acts have stoked fears of a full-scale war that could engulf the region.

In Syria, Netanyahu has ordered hundreds of airstrikes since the Syrian civil war began in 2011, targeting Iranian forces and Hezbollah arms convoys. In 2018, he boasted publicly, “We have struck thousands of targets to stop Iran’s entrenchment in Syria and will continue to hit them anywhere in Syria and beyond,” setting a precedent for near-constant Israeli raids that have killed hundreds of fighters and civilians alike. These attacks have often destabilized ceasefires and complicated humanitarian efforts, with Syrian civilians paying a heavy price. In 2015, Netanyahu told voters that only he could “prevent Syria from becoming a base for Iranian terror that will burn the entire Middle East,” using the specter of endless conflict to rally support.

Netanyahu’s war calculus also extended to Iraq. In 2019, according to U.S. intelligence leaks, Israel launched covert airstrikes on Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces depots, killing fighters and destroying infrastructure. Netanyahu publicly hinted at Israel’s involvement, declaring Israel would “strike Iranian assets wherever they are, including Iraq,” remarks that rattled Baghdad and raised the specter of a broader regional war.

In Yemen, Netanyahu accused the Iran-backed Houthis of plotting attacks on Israel from afar and threatened strikes on Yemeni soil. Meanwhile, he pressured Gulf Arab states into closer security pacts by painting Iran’s regional activities — in Bahrain, the UAE, and the wider Gulf — as existential threats requiring a de facto Israeli-Arab alliance under his leadership.

This bellicose approach found one of its starkest expressions in June 2025, when Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a massive attack on more than 100 Iranian military and nuclear facilities. The assault killed at least 224 people, many civilians, and injured more than 1,000. Iran retaliated with missile strikes on Israeli cities that killed dozens, marking the most dangerous direct conflict ever between the two countries. Netanyahu framed the attack as vital to freeing Israeli hostages in Gaza and halting Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but the escalation prompted international condemnation and fears of a regional war spiraling out of control.

Throughout these wars, Netanyahu has used bombastic speeches and dramatic visuals — like his infamous 2012 UN presentation where he drew a red line on a cartoon bomb to warn of Iran’s nuclear program — to keep Israel’s population and allies focused on external threats. Critics argue these tactics are designed to distract from his domestic political and legal crises.

Netanyahu’s political survival has indeed depended heavily on these cycles of war. Since 2019, he has been on trial for three major corruption cases — Cases 1000, 2000, and 4000 — involving bribery, fraud, and breach of trust. In Case 1000, prosecutors accuse him of accepting luxury gifts worth nearly 700,000 shekels from billionaires such as Arnon Milchan and James Packer in return for political favors. In Case 2000, he allegedly negotiated a deal with the publisher of Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper for favorable coverage in exchange for undermining a rival outlet. In Case 4000, Netanyahu is accused of approving regulatory benefits worth hundreds of millions of dollars for telecom giant Bezeq’s owner, Shaul Elovitch, who then skewed Walla News coverage to favor him. Netanyahu has repeatedly delayed these trials, citing national security crises like Gaza and Iran, while denouncing the charges as part of a leftist conspiracy to topple him.

His domestic policies have only fueled polarization further. From 2022 to 2024, Netanyahu pushed sweeping judicial reforms that critics said would undermine Israeli democracy by stripping the Supreme Court of its power to check the government. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis took to the streets in some of the largest protests in the nation’s history. Under pressure, Netanyahu paused parts of the overhaul, but has vowed to revive it, framing the judiciary as an obstacle to the will of the people.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu has pursued settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank at an unprecedented pace, approving thousands of new housing units and further entrenching Israeli control in defiance of multiple UN Security Council resolutions. This expansion has intensified daily violence between settlers and Palestinians, stoking tensions that could explode into wider conflict at any moment.

Even as Israel reels from war with Iran, Netanyahu has continued to signal readiness for more aggression. His government has warned Hezbollah and Syria that Israel would not hesitate to strike again if it detected Iranian weapons transfers. His repeated threats that Israel will “do whatever it takes” to destroy Iranian capabilities, including in Syria and Lebanon, have deepened regional instability and left millions across the Middle East living in fear of the next Israeli operation.

Netanyahu’s defenders insist his tough policies have kept Israel safe, pointing to the normalization deals with some Arab states as proof of his strategic vision. But critics, including former Israeli military and intelligence officials, warn that his wars have radicalized new generations of militants across Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran, and that his approach leaves Israel more isolated internationally while cementing cycles of hatred and violence that undermine its long-term security.

Despite repeated international condemnations and polls showing a majority of Israelis want him to step down, Netanyahu has kept power through alliances with ultra-nationalist and religious parties, along with a strategy of portraying himself as Israel’s irreplaceable defender. Yet with Gaza on the brink of famine, Iran vowing revenge, and a corruption trial still looming over his future, Netanyahu’s relentless focus on war as a means of political survival has pushed Israel and the Middle East to a level of instability not seen in decades. Without decisive action by both Israeli society and the international community, many fear Netanyahu’s legacy will be a region locked in endless war.

Lebanon says 15 killed by Israeli forces after withdrawal deadline missed

Israeli soldiers have killed 15 people and wounded more than 80 in southern Lebanon, the Lebanese health ministry says, as the Israeli military remained in parts of the country after the expiration of a deadline for their withdrawal, and Hezbollah’s removal from the area.

On Sunday morning, thousands of residents returned to towns and villages along the border, despite warnings by the Lebanese and Israeli armies, and the UN, that the region remained unsafe.

Israel said the 60-day ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah had not been fully implemented, and it remained unclear how many of its soldiers remained in Lebanon or how long they would stay.

According to the Lebanese health ministry, Israeli forces attacked people as they tried to enter locations that were still under occupation. The Lebanese army said one of its soldiers had been killed and another wounded by Israeli fire.

The Israeli military said it had fired “warning shots in multiple areas” of southern Lebanon, without specifying if people had been hit, and apprehended several people it claimed posed an “imminent threat”.

The ceasefire deal, which was brokered by the US and France and put an end to 14 months of conflict, stipulated the withdrawal of Israeli troops and the removal of Hezbollah fighters and weapons from southern Lebanon. At the same time, thousands of Lebanese soldiers were expected to be deployed to the area where, for decades, Hezbollah has been the dominant force.

A Western diplomatic official familiar with the negotiations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Israel had said it needed more time to destroy Hezbollah’s infrastructure in southern Lebanon, and that the initial plan was for a 30-day extension.

In recent days, Hezbollah’s TV station Al Manar appeared to encourage people to return south and, in some places, convoys arrived waving the yellow and green flag of the group.

The passing of the ceasefire deadline is the first major test for the new Lebanese president, army chief Joseph Aoun, who is keen to bring stability to a country exhausted by multiple crises.

In a statement issued on Sunday, he said Lebanon’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity are non-negotiable”, adding that he was “following this issue at the highest levels”.

The conflict escalated last September, leading to an intense Israeli air campaign across Lebanon, the assassination of Hezbollah’s senior leaders and a ground invasion of southern Lebanon. The offensive killed around 4,000 people in Lebanon – including many civilians – and led to the displacement of more than 1.2 million residents.

On Friday, the office of the Israeli prime minister said the withdrawal outlined in the ceasefire was “conditioned on the Lebanese army deploying in southern Lebanon and fully and effectively enforcing the agreement, while Hezbollah withdraws beyond the Litani”, a river about 30km (20 miles) from the the unofficial border between Lebanon and Israel known as the Blue Line.

“Since the ceasefire agreement has yet to be fully enforced by the Lebanese state, the gradual withdrawal process will continue, in full coordination with the US,” the statement said.

In a statement on Saturday, the Lebanese army said it continued to “implement the plan to enhance deployment” in areas along the border, but that there had been “delays in some stages due to the Israeli enemy’s procrastination in withdrawing, complicating the army’s deployment mission”.

There has been no immediate reaction from Hezbollah. On Thursday, the group said failure to comply with the deadline would be a “blatant violation of the agreement, an infringement on Lebanese sovereignty, and an entry into a new phase of occupation”.

However, the statement did not say how the group would respond if Israeli troops remained in the country.

This is possibly an indication of the delicate position the group finds itself in. The Iranian-backed militant, political and social movement was severely weakened in the conflict with Israel, although it continues to enjoy significant support among Shia Muslims in Lebanon.

The ceasefire deal was widely considered as a surrender by the group, after it saw its infrastructure and weapons arsenal depleted and hundreds of fighters and key figures killed, including long-time leader Hassan Nasrallah.

Despite some violations before the withdrawal deadline, the truce put an end to the violence which caused billions of dollars in destruction and damage, allowing thousands of residents to return to their homes in Lebanon.

If it decides to resume its attacks, Hezbollah will face opposition from critics, who had accused the group of dragging Lebanon into a war that was not in the country’s interests, and possibly even from some of its own supporters.

Earlier this month, Lebanon’s parliament was able to elect a president after more than two years of political impasse blamed by critics on the group.

Aoun has promised ambitious reforms to rebuild state institutions long plagued by corruption, revive the collapsed economy after years of crisis, and the right to monopolise the possession of weapons, which would mean trying to curb Hezbollah’s military power.

It remains unclear whether the army is able – and willing – to do so, amid concerns that any action against the group could spark internal violence.

Israel’s stated goal in its war against Hezbollah was to allow the return of about 60,000 residents who had been displaced from communities in the country’s north because of the group’s attacks, and to remove it from areas along the border.

Hezbollah launched its campaign the day after the Hamas attacks on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, saying it was acting in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.BBC